Visual Maps for Process Research: Displaying the Invisible

  • Aura Parmentier-Cajaiba Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, GREDEG, Valbonne, France
  • Giovany Cajaiba-Santana Kedge Business School, Marseille, France
Keywords: Visual mapping, Data visualization, Inscriptions, Process research, Reflexivity

Abstract

In this article, we present visual maps as a way of visually representing qualitative data to improve rigor and analysis in process research. Visual representation of data is an essential element of scientific discourse, and historically scholars have put a great deal of effort into finding creative and efficient ways of visually representing quantitative data. Nevertheless, despite endeavors to integrate visual methods into organizational and management research, qualitative research still lacks a conceptual grounding of the ontological status of visual representation as well as effective tools to visually display data. We contribute to filling these gaps and start a discussion on qualitative data visualization by proposing Latour’s concept of inscription as a conceptual framework and the use of visual maps as a methodological tool for qualitative process research. We provide an analytical example of how visual mapping could become a methodological tool that enables recognizing patterns, condensing data, and comparing and examining relationships over time that are not necessarily visible independently of their representations. This also enables researchers to make sense of data, improve analysis, and theorize, thus fostering reflexive thinking and facilitating communication.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Aura Parmentier-Cajaiba, Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, GREDEG, Valbonne, France

Dr. Aura Parmentier Cajaiba’s is Assistant Professeur at Université Cote d’Azur. Her research focuses on the strategy and organization for the elaboration and diffusion of ecological and social innovation. She values interactions and collaborations with practitioners to elaborate academic knowledge and has a strong interest for and a deep understanding of qualitative methods.

Giovany Cajaiba-Santana, Kedge Business School, Marseille, France

Dr. Giovany Cajaiba-Santana is Assistant Professor at KEDGE Business School. His research focuses on institutional theory, social innovation, sustainable development and corporate social responsibility.

References


Abdallah, C., Lusiani, M. & Langley, A. (2019). Performing process research. In B. Boyd, T. R. Crook, J. K. Lê & A. D. Smith (Eds.), Standing on the shoulders of giants: Traditions and innovations in research methodology. Emerald Publishing.


Alvesson, M. & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. Sage.


Ancona, D. G., Goodman, P. S., Lawrence, B. S. & Tushman, M. L. (2001). Time: A new research lens. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 645–653. doi: 10.2307/3560246


Ancona, D. G., Okhuysen, G. A. & Perlow, L. A. (2001). Taking time to integrate temporal research. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 512–529. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2001.5393887


Avenier, M.-J. (2010). Shaping a constructivist view of organizational design science. Organization Studies, 31(9–10), 1229–1255. doi: 10.1177/0170840610374395


Avenier, M.-J. & Parmentier Cajaiba, A. (2012). The dialogical model: Developing academic knowledge for and from practice. European Management Review, 9(4), 199–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-4762.2012.01038.x


Avenier, M.-J. & Thomas, C. (2015). Finding one’s way around various methodological guidelines for doing rigorous case studies: A comparison of four epistemological frameworks. Systèmes d’Information et Management, 20(1), 61–98. doi: 10.3917/sim.151.0061


Bansal, P. & Corley, K. (2012). Publishing in AMJ – Part 7: What’s different about qualitative research? Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 509–513. doi: 10.5465/amj.2012.4003


Bell, E. & Davison, J. (2013). Visual management studies: Empirical and theoretical approaches. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(2), 167–184. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00342.x


Berard, T. J. (2005). Evaluative categories of action and identity in non-evaluative human studies research: Examples from ethnomethodology. Qualitative Sociology Review, 1(1), 1–25.


Berends, H. & Deken, F. (2019). Composing qualitative process research. Strategic Organization. doi: 10.1177/1476127018824838


Bertin, J. (1981). Graphics and graphic information processing. Walter de Gruyter.


Bezemer, J. & Mavers, D. (2011). Multimodal transcription as academic practice: A social semiotic perspective. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(3), 191–206. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2011.563616


Bhowmick, T. (2006). Building an exploratory visual analysis tool for qualitative researchers. Proceedings of AutoCarto. Vancouver, WA.


Blanchet, V. (2017). Performing market categories through visual inscriptions: The case of ethical fashion. Organization, 25(3), 374–400. doi: 10.1177/1350508417743805


Callon, M. (1984). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review, 32(1_suppl), 196–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x


Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D. & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Readings in information visualization: Using vision to think. Morgan Kaufmann.


Chaplin, E. (2002). Sociology and visual representation. Routledge.


Coopmans, C., Vertesi, J., Lynch, M. E. & Woolgar, S. (2014). Representation in scientific practice revisited. Cambridge: MIT Press.


Davison, J., McLean, C. & Warren, S. (2012). Exploring the visual in organizations and management. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 7(1), 5–15. doi: 10.1108/17465641211223528


De Vaujany, F.-X. & Vaast, E. (2016). Matters of visuality in legitimation practices: Dual iconographies in a meeting room. Organization, 23(5), 763–790. doi: 10.1177/1350508416640923


Fenton, E. M. (2007). Visualising strategic change: The role and impact of process maps as boundary objects in reorganisation. European Management Journal, 25(2), 104–117. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2007.02.003


Fyfe, G. & Law, J. (1988). Picturing power: Visual depiction and social relations (Vol. 35). Routledge.


Gehman, J., Trevino, L. K. & Garud, R. (2013). Values work: A process study of the emergence and performance of organizational values practices. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 84–112. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0628


Gephart, R. P. (2004). Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 454–462. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2004.14438580


Gersick, C. J. G. (1992). Time and transition in my work on teams: Looking back on a new model of group development. In P. J. Frost & R. E. Stablein (Eds.), Doing exemplary research (pp. 52–64). Sage.


Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G. & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. doi: 10.1177/1094428112452151


Greve, H. R. (2018). Show me the data! Improving evidence presentation for publication. Management and Organization Review, 14(2), 423–432. doi: 10.1017/mor.2018.18


Hammersley, M. (2008). Context and contextuality. In L. Given (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (Vol. 1, pp. 122–123). Sage.


Hardy, C., Phillips, N. & Clegg, S. (2001). Reflexivity in organization and management theory: A study of the production of the research “subject.” Human Relations, 54(5), 531–560. doi: 10.1177/0018726701545001


Hernes, T., Simpson, B. & Söderlund, J. (2013). Managing and temporality. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 29(1), 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.scaman.2012.11.008


Hibbert, P., Sillince, J., Diefenbach, T. & Cunliffe, A. L. (2014). Relationally reflexive practice a generative approach to theory development in qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods, 17(3), 278–298. doi: 10.1177/1094428114524829


Howard-Grenville, J., Metzger, M. L. & Meyer, A. D. (2013). Rekindling the flame: Processes of identity resurrection. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 113–136. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0778


Hughes, J. (2012). SAGE Visual Methods. Sage.


Hurmerinta, L., Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. & Hassett, M. E. (2016). Tempus fugit: A hermeneutic approach to the internationalisation process. Management International Review, 56(6), 805–825. doi: 10.1007/s11575-016-0303-x


Ivins, W. M. (1938). Papers: On the rationalization of sight, with an examination of three renaissance texts on perspective (Vol. 8). Metropolitan Museum of Art.


Janczak, S. (2006). Micro-strategizing and the three logics of action. Australian Journal of Management, 31(1), 115–140. doi: 10.1177/031289620603100107


Klag, M. & Langley, A. (2013). Approaching the conceptual leap in qualitative research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(2), 149–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00349.x


Kress, G. R. & Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.


Kunter, A. & Bell, E. (2006). The promise and potential of visual organizational research. M@n@gement, 9(3), 177–197. doi: 10.3917/mana.093.0177


Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1999.2553248


Langley, A. (2007). Process thinking in strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 5(3), 271–282. doi: 10.1177/1476127007079965


Langley, A. & Abdallah, C. (2011). Templates and turns in qualitative studies of strategy and management. In D. D. Bergh & D. J. Ketchen (Eds.), Research methodology in strategy and management: Vol. 6 Building methodological bridges (pp. 201–235). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.


Langley, A. & Ravasi, D. (2019). Visual artifacts as tools for analysis and theorizing. In T. B. Zilber, J. M. Amis & J. Mair (Eds.), The production of managerial knowledge and organizational theory: New approaches to writing, producing and consuming theory (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 59) (pp. 173–199). Emerald Publishing Limited. doi: 10.1108/S0733-558X20190000059010


Langley, A. & Royer, I. (2006). Perspectives on doing case study research in organizations. M@n@gement, 9(3), 81–94. doi: 10.3917/mana.093.0081


Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H. & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1–13. doi: 10.5465/amj.2013.4001


Langley, A. & Truax, J. (1994). A process study of new technology adoption in smaller manufacturing firms. Journal of Management Studies, 31(5), 619–652. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00632.x


Langley, A. & Tsoukas, H. (2010). Introducing “Perspectives on process organization studies.” In T. Hernes & S. Maitlis (Eds.), Process, sensemaking, & organizing (Vol. 1, pp. 1–26). Oxford University Press.


Langley, A. & Tsoukas, H. (2017). Introduction: Process thinking, process theorizing and process researching. In A. Langley & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of process organization studies (pp. 1–26). Sage.


Latour, B. (1986). Visualization and cognition: Drawing things together. Knowledge and Society, 6(6), 1–40.


Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press.


Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life. The construction of scientific facts. Princeton University Press.


Lawrence, T. B., Malhotra, N. & Morris, T. (2012). Episodic and systemic power in the transformation of professional service firms: Power in the transformation of professional firms. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1), 102–143. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01031.x


Lee, B. & Cassell, C. (2013). Research methods and research practice: History, themes and topics. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(2), 123–131. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12012


Light, A. & Anderson, T. D. (2009). Research project as boundary object: Negotiating the conceptual design of a tool for international development. In I. Wagner, H. Telliog˘lu, E. Balka, C. Simone & L. Ciolfi (eds.), ECSCW 2009 (pp. 21–41) Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-84882-854-4_2


Lok, J. & de Rond, M. (2013). On the plasticity of institutions: Containing and restoring practice breakdowns at the Cambridge University Boat Club. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 185–207. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0688


Lynch, M. (2006). The production of scientific images. Vision and re-vision in the history, philosophy, and sociology of science. In L. Pauwels (Ed.), Visual cultures of science: Rethinking representational practices in knowledge building and science communication (pp. 26–40). Dartmouth College Press.


Mainela, T. & Puhakka, V. (2008). Embeddedness and networking as drivers in developing an international joint venture. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24(1), 17–32. doi: 10.1016/j.scaman.2007.10.002


Maire, S. & Liarte, S. (2018). Building on visuals: Taking stock and moving ahead. M@n@gement, 21(4), 1405–1423. doi: 10.3917/mana.214.1405


Maruyama, M. (1986). Toward picture-coded information systems. Futures, 18(3), 450–452. doi: 10.1016/0016-3287(86)90026-1


Maxwell, J. A. & Miller, B. A. (2008). Categorizing and connecting strategies in qualitative data analysis. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 461–477). The Guilford Press.


Meyer, A. D. (1991). Visual data in organizational research. Organization Science, 2(2), 218–236. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.2.218


Meyer, R. E., Höllerer, M. A., Jancsary, D. & Van Leeuwen, T. (2013). The visual dimension in organizing, organization, and organization research: Core ideas, current developments, and promising avenues. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 489–555. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2013.781867


Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1984a). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13(5), 20–30. doi: 10.3102/0013189X013005020


Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1984b). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. In Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Sage.


Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd Ed.). Sage.


Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd Ed.). Sage.


Mitchell, J. & Rands, M. (2012). Think with your eyes: Considerations when visualizing information. Presented at the Research Institute for Studies in Education (RISE) – Iowa State University. Retrieved from http://www.rise.hs.iastate.edu/documents/VisualizingInformation.pdf


Myatt, G. J. & Johnson, W. P. (2009). Making sense of data II: A practical guide to data visualization, advanced data mining methods, and applications. Wiley.


Nadin, S. & Cassell, C. (2006). The use of a research diary as a tool for reflexive practice: Some reflections from management research. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 3(3), 208–217. doi: 10.1108/11766090610705407


Nicolini, D. (2010). Medical Innovation as a process of translation: A case from the field of telemedicine. British Journal of Management, 21(4), 1011–1026. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00627.x


Parmentier Cajaiba, A. (2010). La construction de compétences fondamentales: Une application à l’homologation dans l’industrie du biocontrôle. PhD thesis. Université de Grenoble.


Pauwels, L. (2006a). A theoretical framework for assessing visual representational practices in knowledge building and science communications. In L. Pauwels (Ed.), Visual cultures of science: Rethinking representational practices in knowledge building and science communication (pp. 1–25). Dartmouth College Press.


Pauwels, L. (2006b). The role of visual representation in the production of scientific reality. In L. Pauwels (Ed.), Visual cultures of science: Rethinking representational practices in knowledge building and science communication (pp. vii, xix). Dartmouth College Press.


Pauwels, L. (2010). Visual sociology reframed: An analytical synthesis and discussion of visual methods in social and cultural research. Sociological Methods & Research, 38(4), 545–581. doi: 10.1177/0049124110366233


Pratt, M. G. (2009). From the editors: For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 856–862. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2009.44632557


Quattrone, P. (2009). Books to be practiced: Memory, the power of the visual, and the success of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(1), 85–118. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2008.03.001


Ravasi, D. (2017). Visualizing our way through theory building. Journal of Management Inquiry, 26(2), 1–4. doi: 10.1177/1056492616680575


Romme, A. G. L., Avenier, M.-J., Denyer, D., Hodgkinson, G. P. et al. (2015). Towards common ground and trading zones in management research and practice. British Journal of Management, 26(3), 544–559. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12110


Roth, W.-M. & McGinn, M. K. (1998). Inscriptions: Toward a theory of representing as social practice. Review of Educational Research, 68(1), 35–59. doi: 10.3102/00346543068001035


Roth, W.-M., Pozzer-Ardenghi, L. & Han, J. Y. (2006). Critical graphicacy: Understanding visual representation practices in school science. Springer Science & Business Media.


Smith, A. D. (2002). From process data to publication: A personal sensemaking. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11(4), 383–406. doi: 10.1177/1056492602238847


Smith, D. E. (1979). On sociological description: A method from Marx. Human Studies, 4(1), 313–337. doi: 10.1007/BF02127465


Spekkink, W. (2013). Institutional capacity building for industrial symbiosis in the Canal Zone of Zeeland in the Netherlands: A process analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 342–355. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.025


Star, S. L. & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. doi: 10.1177/030631289019003001


Steyaert, C., Marti, L. & Michels, C. (2012). Multiplicity and reflexivity in organizational research: Towards a performative approach to the visual. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 7(1), 34–53. doi: 10.1108/17465641211223456


Sutton, R. I. & Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 371–384. doi: 10.2307/2393788


Trumbo, J. (2006). Making science visible: Visual literacy in science communication. In L. Pauwels (Ed.), Visual cultures of science: Rethinking representational practices in knowledge building and science communication (pp. 266–283). Dartmouth College Press.


Tufte, E. R. (1990). Envisioning information. Graphics Press.


Verweij, S. & Gerrits, L. M. (2013). Understanding and researching complexity with qualitative comparative analysis: Evaluating transportation infrastructure projects. Evaluation, 19(1), 40–55. doi: 10.1177/1356389012470682


Walsh, I., Holton, J. A., Bailyn, L., Fernandez, W. et al. (2015). What grounded theory is… a critically reflective conversation among scholars. Organizational Research Methods, 18(4), 581–599. doi: 10.1177/1094428114565028


Ware, C. (2012). Information visualization: Perception for design. Elsevier.


Weber, M. (1949). The methodology of the social sciences. The Free Press of Glencoe.


Weber, M. (2017). Methodology of social sciences. Routledge.


Weick, K. E. (1995). What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 385–390. doi: 10.2307/2393789


Welch, C. & Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. (2014). Putting process (back) in: Research on the internationalization process of the firm. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(1), 2–23. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12006

Published
2020-12-16
How to Cite
Parmentier-Cajaiba, A., & Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2020). Visual Maps for Process Research: Displaying the Invisible. M@n@gement, 23(4), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.37725/mgmt.v23i4.4501
Section
Original Research Articles