How Communicative Performances Can Constitute an Organization’s Self

Fabien  Hildwein

doi:10.37725/mgmt.v23.4425

Fabien Hildwein Centre d’Economie de l’Université Paris Nord (CEPN), Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Villetaneuse, France

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37725/mgmt.v23.4425

Keywords: Communicative performances, Organization’s self, Communicative constitution of organizing, Activist groups, Qualitative case-study

Abstract

The creation of an organization’s self is the attribution of a collective will and agency to a group of individuals, thereby constituting them into an organization able to interact with its peers. As such, the organization’s self represents a central issue for collective action, as studied through the prism of the “communicative constitution of organizing” (CCO). Performances, as communicative and spectacular events during which a collectivity presents its self and displays a given message, represent a little-studied opportunity to understand the constitution of the organization’s self, and to explore the links between the organization’s self and the selves of its members. The empirical part of this study analyses the French feminist activist group, La Barbe, which uses innovative performances to denounce the absence of women at the top of organizations. The paper’s contribution is twofold: the analysis presents how visual and symbolic performances can help to constitute an organization’s self, notably through what performances produce for the organization: visibility, coordination and mobilization. Second, it shows the impact of performances on those who execute them, which retroactively has important organizational effects by ensuring their engagement in the organization.

Manuscript accepted by Jeremy Morales

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Fabien Hildwein, Centre d’Economie de l’Université Paris Nord (CEPN), Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Villetaneuse, France

Fabien Hildwein is Assistant Professor in Management at the CEPN (Université Sorbonne Paris Nord). He received his Ph.D. from HEC-Paris. His main research interests focus on alternative organizations and their organizing processes (in particular communication and mobilization). He is currently conducting an ethnographic study of innovative organizations in the mental health sector, in underprivileged areas.

References

Ashcraft, K. L. (2001). Organized dissonance: Feminist bureaucracy as hybrid form. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1301–1322. doi: 10.5465/3069402

Ashcraft, K. L., Kuhn, T. & Cooren, F. (2009). Constitutioal amendments: ‘Materializing’ organizational communication. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 1–64. doi: 10.5465/19416520903047186

Barlatier, P.-J., Chauvet, V. & Morales, J. (2017). Management alternatif. Déplacer les frontières du management. Revue Française de Gestion, 264(3), 11–22. doi: 10.3166/rfg.2017.00125

Beaud, S. & Weber, F. (2010). Guide de l’enquête de terrain (quatrième édition augmentée). Paris: La Découverte.

Bencherki, N. & Cooren, F. (2011). Having to be: The possessive constitution of organization. Human Relations, 64(12), 1579–1607. doi: 10.1177/0018726711424227

Bisel, R. S. (2010). A communicative ontology of organization? A description, history, and critique of CCO theories for organization science. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 124–131. doi: 10.1177/0893318909351582

Broqua, C. & Fillieule, O. (2009). ActUp ou les raisons de la colère. In C. Traïni (Ed.), Emotions… Mobilisation! (pp. 141–167). Paris: Les Presses de Sciences Po.

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.

Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. New York, NY: Routledge.

Cabantous, L., Gond, J.-P., Harding, N. & Learmonth, M. (2016). Critical essay: Reconsidering critical performativity. Human Relations, 69(2), 197–213. doi: 10.1177/0018726715584690

Cooren, F. (2012). Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 1–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01622.x

Cooren, F. (2014). Pragmatism as ventriloquism: Creating a dialogue among seven traditions in the study of communication. Language Under Discussion, 2(1), 1–26.

Cooren, F. & Bencherki, N. (2010). How things do things with words: Ventriloquism, passion and technology. Encyclopedia, XIV(28), 35–62.

Cooren, F., Kuhn, T., Cornelissen, J. P. & Clark, T. (2011). Communication, organizing and organization: An overview and introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 32(9), 1149–1170. doi: 10.1177/0170840611410836

Cooren, F. & Sandler, S. (2014). Polyphony, ventriloquism, and constitution: In dialogue with bakhtin. Communication Theory, 24(3), 225–244. doi: 10.1111/comt.12041

Cooren, F. & Taylor, J. R. (1997). Organization as an effect of mediation: Redefining the link between organization and communication. Communication Theory, 7(3), 219–260. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1997.tb00151.x

Cunliffe, A. L. (2010). Retelling tales of the field: In search of organizational ethnography 20 years on. Organizational Research Methods, 13(2), 224–239. doi: 10.1177/1094428109340041

Delphy, C. (1979). L’ennemi principal. 1. Economie politique du patriarcat (Vol. 1). Paris: Editions Syllepse.

Dobusch, L. & Schoeneborn, D. (2015). Fluidity, identity, and organizationality: The communicative constitution of Anonymous. Journal of Management Studies, 52(8), 1005–1035. doi: 10.1111/joms.12139

Dorion, L. (2017). Construire une organisation alternative. Revue Française de Gestion, 43(264), 143–160. doi: 10.3166/rfg.2017.00109

Espínola, A. F. (2012). Subjectivité et connaissance : réflexions sur les épistémologies du point de vue? Cahiers du Genre, 53(2), 99. doi: 10.3917/cdge.053.0099

Fillieule, O. (2010). Tombeau pour Charles Tilly. Répertoires, performances et stratégies d’action. In O. Fillieule, E. Agrikoliansky & I. Sommier (Eds.), Penser les mouvements sociaux (pp. 77–99). Paris: La Découverte.

Freeman, J. (1972). The tyranny of structurelessness. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 17, 151–164.

Germain, O. & Josserand, E. (2013). The M@n@gement journey, spanning boundaries and navigating at the fringe. M@n@gement, 16(5), 535. doi: 10.3917/mana.165.0535

Gibson-Graham, J. K. (1996). The end of capitalism (as we knew it): A feminist critique of political economy. Oxford: Blackwell.

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, MA: Policy Press.

Gond, J.-P., Cabantous, L., Harding, N. & Learmonth, M. (2016). What do we mean by performativity in organizational and management theory? The uses and abuses of performativity: Organizing performativity. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(4), 440–463. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12074

Grothe-Hammer, M. (2019). Organization without actorhood: Exploring a neglected phenomenon. European Management Journal, 37(3), 325–338. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2018.07.009

Haraway, D. (1988). Manifeste cyborg et autres essais. Paris: Exils éditeur.

Hildwein, F. (2016). How a feminist activist group builds its repertoire of actions: A case study. In C. Schwabenland, C. Lange, S. Nakagawa & J. Onyx (Eds.), Women’s emancipation and civil society organisations. Challenging or maintaining the status quo? (pp. 113–134). Bristol: Policy Press.

Hildwein, F. (2017). Mobilisation au travail par les compétences : l’apport de l’étude des groupes activistes. RIMHE : Revue Interdisciplinaire Management, Homme & Entreprise, 26(2), 49. doi: 10.3917/rimhe.026.0049

Hildwein, F. (2019). The ethnographer as an intruder: Becoming an ‘Honorary Female’ within a feminist collective. M@n@gement – Unplugged, 92(1), 119–122.

Kozica, A. M. F., Gebhardt, C., Müller-Seitz, G. & Kaiser, S. (2015). Organizational identity and paradox: An analysis of the ‘Stable State of Instability’ of Wikipedia’s identity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(2), 186–203. doi: 10.1177/1056492614553275

Le Bon, G. (1895). Psychologie des foules. Paris: Alcan.

McCammon, H. J. (2003). ‘Out of the Parlors and into the Streets’: The changing tactical repertoire of the U.S. women’s suffrage movements. Social Forces, 81(3), 787–818. doi: 10.1353/sof.2003.0037

McCarthy, J. D. (2005). Persistence and change among nationally federated social movements. In G. F. Davis, D. McAdam, W. R. Scott & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Social movements and organization theory (pp. 193–225). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Molinier-Boyd, M.-P. (1995). Les crises politiques et l’image des femmes dans les représentations du pouvoir. Clio. Femmes, Genre, Histoire, 1. doi: 10.4000/clio.528

Naples, N. A. (2003). Feminism and method. Ethnography, discourse analysis and activist research. London: Routledge.

Parker, M., Cheney, G., Fournier, V. & Land, C. (Eds.). (2014). The routledge companion to alternative organization. New York, NY: Routledge.

Patouillard, V. (1998). Une colère politique. L’usage du corps dans une situation exceptionnelle : le ZAP d’Act-up Paris. Sociétés Contemporaines, 31(1), 15–36. doi: 10.3406/socco.1998.1769

Putnam, L. L. & Nicotera, A. M. (2009). Building theories of organization. The constitutive role of communication. New York, NY: Routledge.

Putnam, L. L., Nicotera, A. M. & McPhee, R. D. (2009). Introduction. Communication constitutes organization. In L. L. Putnam & A. M. Nicotera (Eds.), Building theories of organization. The constitutive role of communication (pp. 1–19). New York, NY: Routledge.

Reinhold, E. (2017). Art performance as research, friction and deed. M@n@gement, 20(1), 70. doi: 10.3917/mana.201.0070

Rouleau, L., de Rond, M. & Musca, G. (2014). From the ethnographic turn to new forms of organizational ethnography. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 3(1), 2–9. doi: 10.1108/JOE-02-2014-0006

Schoeneborn, D. & Blaschke, S. (2014). The three schools of CCO thinking: Interactive dialogue and systematic comparison. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(2), 285–316. doi: 10.1177/0893318914527000

Schoeneborn, D. & Scherer, A. G. (2010). Communication as constitutive of terrorist organizations. Academy of Management Proceedings, August(1), 1–6. doi: 10.5465/ambpp.2010.54500925

Schoeneborn, D. & Scherer, A. G. (2012). Clandestine organizations, al Qaeda, and the paradox of (in)visibility: A response to Stohl and Stohl. Organization Studies, 33(7), 963–971. doi: 10.1177/0170840612448031

Snow, D. A. & Trom, D. (2002). The case study and the study of social movements. In B. Klandermans & S. Staggenborg (Eds.), Methods of social movement research. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Stohl, C. & Stohl, M. (2011). Secret agencies: The communicative constitution of a clandestine organization. Organization Studies, 32(9), 1197–1215. doi: 10.1177/0170840611410839

Taylor, J. R. (2011). Organization as an (imbricated) configuring of transactions. Organization Studies, 32(9), 1273–1294. doi: 10.1177/0170840611411396

Taylor, J. R. & Cooren, F. (1997). What makes communication ‘organizational’? Journal of Pragmatics, 27(4), 409–438. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00044-6

Taylor, V., Kimport, K., Van Dyke, N. & Andersen, E. A. (2009). Culture and mobilization: Tactical repertoires, same-sex weddings, and the impact on gay activism. American Sociological Review, 74(6), 865–890. doi: 10.1177/000312240907400602

Taylor, V. & Van Dyke, N. (2004). ‘Get up, Stand up’: Tactical repertoires of social movements. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 262–293). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Taylor, V. & Whittier, N. (1992). Collective identity in social movement communities. Lesbian feminist mobilization. In A. D. Morris & C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 104–129). London: Yale University Press.

Taylor, V. & Whittier, N. (1995). Analytical approaches to social movement culture: The culture of the women’s movement. In H. Johnston & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social movements and culture (pp. 163–187). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Tilly, C. (2008). Contentious performances. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Tilly, C. & Wood, L. J. (2009). Social movements 1768–2004 (2nd ed.). London: Paradigm Publisher.

Tracy, S. J. & Geist-Martin, P. (2014). Organizing ethnography and qualitative approaches. In L. L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), Organizational communication. Advances in theory, research, and methods (3rd ed., pp. 245–269). London: Sage Publication.

Vásquez, C., Schoeneborn, D. & Sergi, V. (2016). Summoning the spirits: Organizational texts and the (dis)ordering properties of communication. Human Relations, 69(3), 629–659. doi: 10.1177/0018726715589422

Walker, E. T., Martin, A. W. & McCarthy, J. D. (2008). Confronting the state, the corporation, and the academy: The influence of institutional targets on social movement repertoires. American Journal of Sociology, 114(1), 35–76. doi: 10.1086/588737

Watson, T. J. (2011). Ethnography, reality, and truth: The vital need for studies of ‘how things work’ in organizations and management. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 202–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00979.x

Whittier, N. (1995). Feminist generations: The persistence of the radical women’s movement. Philadelphia, PA: Temple.

Ybema, S., Yanow, D., Wels, H. & Kamsteeg, F. (Eds.). (2009). Organizational ethnography. Studying the complexities of everyday life. London: Sage Publication.