Individual Responses to Paradox: The Articulation Between Emotion and Cognition
Abstract
This article examines how emotions and cognition work together to shape individual responses to paradox. While much-existing research focuses on organizational response or the effect that either emotions or cognitions have on individual responses, our work shows how emotion and cognition work together to create individual responses. Based on a qualitative study of a global organization with employees who regularly face paradoxes, we found two cognitive appraisals (perception regarding the difficulty of managing paradoxical tensions and self-perception of leadership role) that either generate emotion or regulate response. By examining the interlinking of appraisal – emotion – appraisal – response, we identify two mechanisms that demonstrate the articulation between emotion and cognition: the nonregulated response and the regulated response. We contribute to the existing literature by detailing each mechanism and explaining how emotions and cognition work together to shape individual responses.
Downloads
References
Adler, P. S., Goldoftas, B. & Levine, D. I. (1999). Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 10(1), 43–68. doi: 10.1287/orsc.10.1.43
Ahuja, R., Gupta, R., Sharma, S., Govil, A. & Venkataraman, K. (2017). Twitter based model for emotional state classification. In 2017 4th International Conference on Signal Processing, Computing and Control (ISPCC) (pp. 494–498). IEEE.
Andriopoulos, C. & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696–717. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1080.0406
Andriopoulos, C. & Lewis, M. W. (2010). Managing innovation paradoxes: Ambidexterity lessons from leading product design companies. Long Range Planning, 43(1), 104–122. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.08.003
Ashforth, B. E. & Reingen, P. H. (2014). Functions of dysfunction: Managing the dynamics of an organizational duality in a natural food cooperative. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(3), 474–516. doi: 10.1177/0001839214537811
Bednarek, R., Paroutis, S. & Sillince, J. (2017). Transcendence through rhetorical practices: Responding to paradox in the science sector. Organization Studies, 38(1), 77–101. doi: 10.1177/0170840616655486
Calabretta, G., Gemser, G. & Wijnberg, N. M. (2017). The interplay between intuition and rationality in strategic decision making: A paradox perspective. Organization Studies, 38(3–4), 365–401. doi: 10.1177/0170840616655483
Chung, C. C. & Beamish, P. W. (2010). The trap of continual ownership change in international equity joint ventures. Organization Science, 21(5), 995–1015. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40926724
Cunha, M. P., Clegg, S. R., Rego, A. & Berti, M. (2021). Paradoxes of power and leadership. Routledge.
Cornelissen, J. P. & Werner, M. D. (2014). Putting framing in perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 181–235. doi: 10.5465/19416520.2014.875669
Cunha, M. P., Clegg, S. R., Rego, A. & Berti, M. (2021). Paradoxes of power and leadership. Routledge.
Cunha, M. P. E. & Putnam, L. L. (2019). Paradox theory and the paradox of success. Strategic Organization, 17(1), 95–106. doi: 10.1177/1476127017739536
Cyert, R. M. & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm (pp. 169–187). Prentice Hall.
Denis, J. L., Lamothe, L. & Langley, A. (2001). The dynamics of collective leadership and strategic change in pluralistic organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 809–837.
Derksen, K., Blomme, R. J., De Caluwe, L., Rupert, J. et al. (2019). Breaking the paradox: Understanding how teams create developmental space. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(3), 366–380. doi: 10.1177/1056492617718090
Drach-Zahavy, A. & Freund, A. (2007). Team effectiveness under stress: A structural contingency approach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(4), 423–450. doi: 10.1002/job.430
Edmondson, A. C. & McManus, S. E. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1246–1264. doi: 10.5465/amr.2007.26586086
Fairhurst, G. T. (2019). Reflections: Return paradox to the wild? Paradox interventions and their implications. Journal of Change Management, 19(1), 6–22. doi: 10.1080/14697017.2018.1552505
Fairhurst, G. T., Smith, W. K., Banghart, S. G., Lewis, M. W. et al. (2016). Diverging and converging: Integrative insights on a paradox meta-perspective. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 173–182. doi: 10.5465/19416520.2016.1162423
Filipowicz, A., Barsade, S. & Melwani, S. (2011). Understanding emotional transitions: The interpersonal consequences of changing emotions in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(3), 541–556. doi: 10.1037/a0023545
Fong, C. T. (2006). The effects of emotional ambivalence on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 1016–1030. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20159814
Francis, H. & Keegan, A. (2020). The ethics of engagement in an age of austerity: A paradox perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(3), 593–607. doi: 10.1007/s10551-018-3976-1
Fürstenberg, N., Alfes, K. & Kearney, E. (2021). How and when paradoxical leadership benefits work engagement: The role of goal clarity and work autonomy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(3), 672–705. doi: 10.1111/joop.12344
Gebert, D., Boerner, S. & Kearney, E. (2010). Fostering team innovation: Why is it important to combine opposing action strategies? Organization Science, 21(3), 593–608. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0485
Gibson, C. B. & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226. doi: 10.2307/20159573
Gioia, D., Corley, K. & Hamilton, A. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. doi: 10.1177/1094428112452151
Gross, J. J. (Ed.), (2013). Handbook of emotion regulation. Guilford Publications.
Guest, G., Namey, E. E. & Mitchell, M. L. (2013). Collecting qualitative data: A field manual for applied research. Sage.
Gylfe, P., Franck, H. & Vaara, E. (2019). Living with paradox through irony. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 155, 68–82. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.03.002
Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J. & Figge, F. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 463–487. doi: 10.5465/amr.2012.0341
Im, G. & Rai, A. (2014). IT-enabled coordination for ambidextrous interorganizational relationships. Information Systems Research, 25(1), 72–92. doi: 10.1287/isre.2013.0496
Jarrett, M. & Vince, R. (2017). Psychoanalytic theory, emotion and organizational paradox. In W. K. Smith, M. W. Lewis, P. Jarzabkowski & A. Langley (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational paradox (pp. 48–65). Oxford University Press.
Jarvenpaa, S. L. & Wernick, A. (2011). Paradoxical tensions in open innovation networks. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(4), 521–548. doi: 10.1108/14601061111174943
Jarzabkowski, P. A. & Lê, J. K. (2017). We have to do this and that? You must be joking: Constructing and responding to paradox through humor. Organization Studies, 38(3–4), 433–462. doi: 10.1177/0170840616640846
Jarzabkowski, P. A., Lê, J. K. & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Responding to competing strategic demands: How organizing, belonging, and performing paradoxes coevolve. Strategic Organization, 11(3), 245–280. doi: 10.1177/1476127013481016
Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0772
Keller, J. & Sadler-Smith, E. (2019). Paradoxes and dual processes: A review and synthesis. International journal of management reviews, 21(2), 162–184. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12200
Keltner, D. & Ekman, P. (2003). Introduction: Expression of emotions. In R. Davison, K. Scherer & H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective science (pp. 411–414). Oxford University Press.
Khazanchi, S., Lewis, M. W. & Boyer, K. K. (2007). Innovation-supportive culture: The impact of organizational values on process innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), 871–884. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2006.08.003
Kihlstrom, J. F. (2009). Unconscious cognition. In W. P. Banks (Ed.), Encyclopedia of consciousness (Vol. 2, pp. 411–421). Academic Press.
Klarner, P. & Raisch, S. (2013). Move to the beat – Rhythms of change and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 160–184. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0767
Knight, E. & Paroutis, S. (2017). Becoming salient: The TMT leader’s role in shaping the interpretive context of paradoxical tensions. Organization Studies, 38(3–4), 403–432. doi: 10.1177/0170840616640844
Larsen, J. T., McGraw, A. P. & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Can people feel happy and sad at the same time? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 684–696. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.684
Lê, J. & Bednarek, R. (2017). Paradox in everyday practice: Applying practice-theoretical principles to paradox. In W. K. Smith, M. W. Lewis, P. Jarzabkowski & A. Langley (Eds.), Oxford handbook of organizational paradox: Approaches to plurality, tensions and contradictions (Vol. 1, pp. 490–509). Oxford University Press.
Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776. doi: 10.2307/259204
Lewis, M. W. & Smith, W. K. (2014). Paradox as a metatheoretical perspective: Sharpening the focus and widening the scope. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), 127–149. doi: 10.1177/0021886314522322
Lewis, M. W. & Smith, W. K. (2022). Reflections on the 2021 decade award: Navigating paradox is paradoxical. Academy of Management Review, 47(4), 528–548. doi: 10.5465/amr.2022.0251
Liu, Y., Xu, S. & Zhang, B. (2020). Thriving at work: How a paradox mindset influences innovative work behavior. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 56(3), 347–366. doi: 10.1177/0021886319888267
Lüscher, L. S. & Lewis, M. W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 221–240. doi: 10.5465/amj.2008.31767217
Lüscher, L. S., Lewis, M. W. & Ingram, A. (2006). The social construction of organizational change paradoxes. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19(4), 491–502. doi: 10.1108/09534810610676680
Maitlis, S. & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125. doi: 10.5465/19416520.2014.873177
McKinley, W. & Scherer, A. G. (2000). Some unanticipated consequences of organizational restructuring. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 735–752. doi: 10.2307/259202
Miron-Spektor, E., Emich, K. J., Argote, L. & Smith, W. K. (2022). Conceiving opposites together: Cultivating paradoxical frames and epistemic motivation fosters team creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 171, 104153. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2022.104153
Miron-Spektor, E., Gino, F. & Argote, L. (2011). Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(2), 229–240. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.006
Miron-Spektor, E., Ingram, A., Keller, J., Smith, W. K. et al. (2018). Microfoundations of organizational paradox: The problem is how we think about the problem. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 26–45. doi: 10.5465/amj.2016.0594
Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Nyberg, D. & Sveningsson, S. (2014). Paradoxes of authentic leadership: Leader identity struggles. Leadership, 10(4), 437–455. doi: 10.1177/1742715013504425
Ochsner, K. N. & Gross, J. J. (2007). The neural architecture of emotion regulation. Handbook of Emotion Regulation, 1(1), 87–109.
Pamphile, V. D. (2022). Paradox peers: A relational approach to navigating a business–society paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 65(4), 1274–1302. doi: 10.5465/amj.2019.0616
Poole, M. S. & Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 562–578. doi: 10.2307/258559
Pouthier, V. & Vince, R. (2020). Paradox, emotions and COVID-19: What can our tears teach us? Journal of Management Inquiry, 30(1), 24–41.
Pradies, C. (2022). With head and heart: How emotions shape paradox navigation in veterinary work. Academy of Management Journal, 66(2), 521–552. doi: 10.5465/amj.2019.0633
Pradies, C., Tunarosa, A., Lewis, M. W. & Courtois, J. (2021). From vicious to virtuous paradox dynamics: The social-symbolic work of supporting actors. Organization Studies, 42(8), 1241–1263. doi: 10.1177/0170840620907200
Pratt, M. G. & Doucet, L. (2000). Ambivalent feelings in organizational relationships. In S. Fineman (Ed.), Emotions in organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 204–226). Sage.
Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T. & Banghart, S. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 65–171. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2016.1162421
Raza-Ullah, T. (2020). Experiencing the paradox of coopetition: A moderated mediation framework explaining the paradoxical tension–performance relationship. Long Range Planning, 53(1), 101863. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.003
Reilly, J. & Seibert, L. (2003). Language and emotion. In R. Davidson, K. Scherer & H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of Affective Sciences (pp. 535–563). Oxford University Press.
Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S. & Smith, W. K. (2016). Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 5–64. doi: 10.5465/19416520.2016.1162422
Scherer, K. R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Social Science Information, 44(4), 695–729. doi: 10.1177/0539018405058216
Schmitt, A. & Raisch, S. (2013). Corporate turnarounds: The duality of retrenchment and recovery. Journal of Management Studies, 50(7), 1216–1244. doi: 10.1111/joms.12045
Smith, W. K. (2014). Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1592–1623. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0932
Smith, W. K., Erez, M., Jarvenpaa, S., Lewis, M. W. et al. (2017). Adding complexity to theories of paradox, tensions, and dualities of innovation and change: Introduction to organization studies special issue on paradox, tensions, and dualities of innovation and change. Organization Studies, 38(3–4), 303–317. doi: 10.1177/0170840617693560
Smith, W. K. & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2011.59330958
Smith, W. K. & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 453–562. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0134
Solebello, N., Tschirhart, M. & Leiter, J. (2016). The paradox of inclusion and exclusion in membership associations. Human Relations, 69(2), 439–460. doi: 10.1177/0018726715590166
Sundaramurthy, C. & Lewis, M. (2003). Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 397–415. doi: 10.2307/30040729
Trefalt, S. (2013). Between you and me: Setting work-nonwork boundaries in the context of workplace relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1802–1829. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0298
Van Neerijnen, P., Tempelaar, M. P. & Van de Vrande, V. (2022). Embracing Paradox: TMT paradoxical processes as a steppingstone between TMT reflexivity and organizational ambidexterity. Organization Studies, 43(11), 1793–1814.
Van Quaquebeke, N., Van Knippenberg, D. & Eckloff, T. (2011). Individual differences in the leader categorization to openness to influence relationship: The role of followers’ self-perception and social comparison orientation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(5), 605–622. doi: 10.1177/1368430210391311
Velu, C. & Stiles, P. (2013). Managing decision-making and cannibalization for parallel business models. Long Range Planning, 46(6), 443–458. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.003
Vince, R. & Broussine, M. (1996). Paradox, defense and attachment: Accessing and working with emotions and relations underlying organizational change. Organization Studies, 17(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1177/017084069601700101
Voronov, M. & Vince, R. (2012). Integrating emotions into the analysis of institutional work. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 58–81. doi: 10.5465/amr.2010.0247
Waldman, D. A., Putnam, L. L., Miron-Spektor, E. & Siegel, D. (2019). The role of paradox theory in decision making and management research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 155, 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.04.006
Williams, P. & Aaker, J. L. (2002). Can mixed emotions peacefully coexist? Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4), 636–649. doi: 10.1086/338206
Wright, A., Zammuto, R. & Liesch, P. (2017). Maintaining the values of a profession: Institutional work and moral emotions in the emergency department. Academy of Management Journal, 60(1), 200–223. doi: 10.5465/amj.2013.0870
Zeier, K., Plimmer, G. & Franken, E. (2021). Developing shared leadership in a public organisation: Processes, paradoxes and consequences. Journal of Management & Organization, 27(3), 564–581. doi: 10.1017/jmo.2018.78
Zheng, W., Kark, R. & Meister, A. L. (2018). Paradox versus dilemma mindset: A theory of how women leaders navigate the tensions between agency and communion. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 584–596. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.04.001
Copyright (c) 2024 The Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to the AIMS.
Published by 