Equipping Organizational Reliability: Between Organization and Situated Activity, the Contribution of Situational Approaches

Stéphanie Gentil

doi:10.37725/mgmt.2025.8910

Stéphanie Gentil Laboratoire d’économie et de management Nantes-Atlantique (LEMNA), Nantes University, Nantes, France https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2095-4481

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37725/mgmt.2025.8910

Keywords: Situation, Organizational reliability, Organizational resilience, Management, Equipment

Abstract

Research on high-reliability organizations (HROs) studies how organizations subject to significant risks manage to maintain their reliability. In such work, reliability is not based exclusively on an organization’s ability to anticipate and prevent problems but is the product of interactions between actors adjusting to unexpected events every day. By focusing primarily on communicative and cognitive processes, HROs neglect the role of equipment in supporting the construction of organizational reliability. We argue that this pitfall arises from the unit of analysis considered by HRO literature, which led us to shift our focus from structure (rules, prevention systems) to situated interactions. We suggest that this should be complemented by a situational analysis framework exploring the theoretical potential of the ‘situation’ concept as an intermediate analysis unit between situated activity and organization. From in situ observation sequences in two operating rooms of a private clinic, we distinguished three types of situations. Here, the entwinement of human activities with equipment that builds reliability takes different forms: standard, bounded, and extended situations. Finally, our research highlights three contributions of a situational approach to thinking about organizational reliability: (1) as an intermediate notion between the given and the created, the situation enables us to study the tangible and intangible equipment supporting reliability; (2) as an intermediary notion between singularity and regularity, it allows us to highlight the influence of context on reliability maintenance activities; and (3) as an intermediary notion between instantaneity of action and permanence of the organization, it lets us identify reliability maintenance trajectories.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Stéphanie Gentil, Laboratoire d’économie et de management Nantes-Atlantique (LEMNA), Nantes University, Nantes, France

Stéphanie Gentil is an associate professor of management science at the Laboratoire d'économie et de management Nantes-Atlantique (LEMNA), part of the School of Economics and Management of Nantes Université (IAE Nantes). She is interested in activity-based approaches and how they can be used to rethink organizations and management methods. In particular, she studies the healthcare and medico-social sectors. Her research focuses on dialogue on work, quality of working life and working conditions, as well as risk management.

References

Arnoud, J. & Peton, H. (2020). Observing to coproduce a collective narrative: Emplotment of multiple parallel stories. M@n@gement, 23(3), 66–78. doi: 10.37725/mgmt.v23i3.5352

Boin, A. & Van Eeten, M. (2013). The resilient organization. Public Management Review, 15(3), 429–445. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.769856

Bourrier, M. (2001). La fiabilité est une question d’organisation. In M. Bourrier (Ed.), Organiser la fiabilité (pp. 9–38). L’Harmattan.

Bourrier, M. (2003). La fiabilité organisationnelle: morceaux choisis d’un état des lieux. In C. Gilbert (dir.), Risques collectifs et situations de crise. Apports de la recherche en sciences humaines et sociales (pp. 199–215). L’Harmattan.

Cantu, J., Tolk, J., Fritts, S. & Gharehyakheh, A. (2020). High reliability organization (HRO) systematic literature review: Discovery of culture as a foundational hallmark. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 28(4), 399–410. doi: 10.1111/1468-5973.12293

Chassin, M. & Loeb, J. (2013). High-reliability health care: Getting there from here. The Milbank Quaterly, 91(3), 459–490. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12023

Czarniawska, B. (2018). Fieldwork techniques for our times: Shadowing. In M. Ciesielska & D. Jemielniak (Eds.), Qualitative methodologies in organization studies (Vol. II Methods and possibilities, pp. 53–74). Palgrave Macmillan.

David, A. (2000). Logique, épistémologie et méthodologie en sciences de gestion. In A. David, A. Hatchuel & R. Laufer (Eds.), Les nouvelles fondations des sciences de gestion (pp. 83–109). Vuibert.

De Bovis, C., Baret, C. & Lentile-Yalenios, J. (2011). Les hôpitaux sont-ils des « organisations à haute fiabilité » ? Apports du concept de « HRO » à la GRH des personnels soignants. Congrès de la GRH, Marrakech. Retrieved from https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00670877

Detchessahar, M. (2019). L’entreprise délibérée. Refonder le management par le dialogue. Nouvelle Cité.

Dewey, J. (1993). Logique. La théorie de l’enquête. Presses universitaires de France.

Dumez, H. (2008). « À propos de la notion de situation de gestion », notes du séminaire de Benoît Journé & Nathalie Raulet-Croset, 12 juin 2008. Le Libellio d’Aegis, 4(2), 36–39. Retrieved from https://hal.science/hal-00408219

Dumez, H. & Minvielle, É. (2020). Le système hospitalier français dans la crise Covid-19 ? Une contribution des sciences de gestion. i3-CRG (Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation, Centre de recherche en gestion). Retrieved from https://hal.science/hal-03053359

Faraj, S. & Xiao, Y. (2006). Coordination in fast-response organizations. Management Science, 52(8), 1155–1169. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0526

Feldman, M. S. & Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1240–1253. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0612

Gentil, S. (2012). Gérer l’événement dans un contexte d’industrialisation des soins. Une approche par l’activité de la coordination au bloc opératoire, Doctoral dissertation, Nantes University, 542 p.

Girin, J. (1983). Les situations de gestion. In M. Berry (Ed.), Le rôle des outils de gestion dans l’évolution des systèmes sociaux complexes (pp. 1–5). Rapport pour le ministère de la Recherche et de la Technologie.

Girin, J. (1989). L’opportunisme méthodique dans les recherches sur la gestion des organisations. Communication à la journée d’étude la recherche action en action et en question, AFCET, collège de systémique, Ecole centrale de Paris.

Girin, J. (1990a). L’analyse empirique des situations de gestion: éléments de théorie et de méthode. In A. Martinet (Ed.), Épistémologie et sciences de gestion (pp. 141–182). Economica.

Girin, J. (1990b). Problème du langage dans les organisations. In J.-F. Chanlat (Ed.), L’individu dans les organisations: les dimensions oubliées (pp. 37–77). Presses universitaires de Laval.

Goffman, E. (1988). La situation négligée. In Y. Winkin (Ed.), Les moments et leurs hommes (pp. 143–149). Éditions de Minuit.

Hollnagel, E., Journé, B. & Laroche, H. (2009). La fiabilité et la résilience comme dimensions de la performance organisationnelle. M@n@gement, 12(4), 224–229. doi: 10.3917/mana.124.0224

Hultin, L. & Mähring, M. (2017). How practice makes sense in healthcare operations: Studying sensemaking as performative, material-discursive practice. Human Relations, 70(5), 566–593. doi: 10.1177/0018726716661618

Jansson, N., Lunkka, N., Suhonen, M., Meriläinen, M. & Wiik, H. (2020). The emergence of sensemaking through socio-material practices. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(4), 597–607. doi: 10.1108/JOCM-10-2018-0280

Journé, B. (2005). Étudier le management de l’imprévu: méthode dynamique d’observation in situ. Finance, Contrôle, Stratégie, 4, 63–91. https://hal.science/hal-00263063

Journé, B. & Raulet-Croset, N. (2008). Le concept de situation: contribution à l’analyse de l’activité managériale en contextes d’ambiguïté et d’incertitude. M@n@gement, 11(1), 27–55. doi: 10.3917/mana.111.0027

Journé, B. & Raulet-Croset, N. (2012). La décision comme activité managériale située: une approche pragmatiste. Revue française de gestion, 6, 109–128. Retrieved from https://www.cairn.info/revue--2012-6-page-109.htm

Laporte, P. & Consolini, P. (1991). Working in practice but not in theory: Theoretical challenges of “high-reliability organizations”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1(1), 19–48. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037070

Leuridan, G. & Demil, B. (2022). Exploring the dynamics of slack in extreme contexts: A practice-based view. Human Relations, 75(6), 1167–1193. doi: 10.1177/00187267211007786

Licoppe, C. (2008). Dans le « carré de l’activité »: perspectives internationales sur le travail et l’activité. Sociologie du travail, 50(3), 287–302. doi: 10.1016/j.soctra.2008.06.002

Lorino, P. (2005). Les instruments, présence fantomatique dans l’œuvre de K. Weick. In D. Autissier & F. Bensebaa (Eds.), Les défis du sensemaking en entreprise (pp. 51–73). Economica.

Lorino, P. & Mourey, D. (2013). The experience of time in the inter-organizing inquiry: A present thickened by dialog and situations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 29(1), 48–62. doi: 10.1016/j.scaman.2012.11.011

Nicolini, D. (2011), Practice as the site of knowing: Insights from the field of telemedicine. Organization Science, 22(3), 602–620. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0556

Nicolini, D. (2012). Practice theory, work, and organization: An introduction. Oxford University Press.

Nicolini, D. & Monteiro, P. (2017). The practice approach: For a praxeology of organisational and management studies. In A. Langley & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), The Sage handbook of process organization studies (pp. 110–126). Sage.

Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249–273. doi: 10.1287/orsc.13.3.249.2776

Orlikowski, W. J. (2006). Material knowing: The scaffolding of human knowledgeability. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(5), 460–466. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000639

Pettersen, K. A. & Schulman, P. R. (2019). Drift, adaptation, resilience and reliability: Toward an empirical clarification. Safety Science, 117, 460–468. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.03.004

Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263. doi: 10.1177/13684310222225432

Roberts, K. H. (1989). New challenges in organizational research: High reliability organizations. Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 3, 111–125. doi: 10.1177/108602668900300202

Roberts, K. H. (2009). Managing the unexpected: Six years of HRO-literature reviewed. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 17(1), 50–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5973.2009.00564.x

Roberts, K. H., Madsen, P., Desai, V. & Van Stralen, D. (2005). A case of the birth and death of a high reliability healthcare organization. BMJ Quality & Safety, 14, 216–220. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2003.009589

Rochlin, G. I., La Porte, T. R. & Roberts, K H. (1987). The self-designing high-reliability organization: Aircraft carrier flight operations at sea. Naval War College Review, 40(4), 76–92. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44637690

Royer, I. (2020). Observer la matérialité dans les organisations. M@n@gement, 23(3), 122–175. doi: 10.37725/mgmt.v23i3.5341

Sandberg, J. & Dall’Alba, G. (2009). Returning to practice anew: A life-world perspective. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1349–1368. doi: 10.1177/0170840609349872

Schatzki, T. R. (2005). Peripheral vision: The sites of organizations. Organization Studies, 26(3), 465–484. doi: 10.1177/0170840605050876

Schatzki, T. R. (2019). Social change in a material world. Routledge.

Schulman, P. R. (1993). The negotiated order of organizational reliability. Administration & Society, 25(3), 353–372. doi: 10.1177/009539979302500305

Shapiro, M. & Jay, G. (2003). High reliability organizational change for hospitals: Translating tenets for medical professionals. BMJ Quality & Safety, 12, 238–239. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.4.238

Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions. The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge University Press.

Théron, C. (2020). Enhancing in situ observation with the SCI design (shadowing–conversations–interview to the double) to capture the cognitive underpinnings of action. M@n@gement, 23(3), 28–44. Retrieved from https://www.cairn.info/revue--2020-3-page-28.htm

Tonneau, D. & Lucas, A. (2006). Gestion et organisation des blocs opératoires dans les hôpitaux et cliniques. Recueil des bonnes pratiques organisationnelles observées. MEAH.

Vinck, D. (2006). L’équipement du chercheur. Comme si la technique était déterminante. Ethnographiques.org, 9. Retrieved from https://www.ethnographiques.org/pdf_version.api/objet/article-148.pdf

Vogus, T. J. & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007). Organizational resilience: Towards a theory and research agenda. In 2007 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (pp. 3418–3422). IEEE.

Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 628–652. doi: 10.2307/2393339

Weick, K. E. & Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 357–381. doi: 10.2307/2393372

Weick, K. E. & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2001). Managing the unexpected (Vol. 9). Jossey-Bass.

Weick, K., Sutcliffe, K. & Obstfeld, D. (1999). Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective. In R. S. Sutton & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 81–123). JAI Press.

Wildavsky, A. (1988). Searching for safety. Transaction Books.

Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research. Design and methods. Sage.