Sustainable Academia: Open, Engaged, and Slow Science

  • Héloïse Berkowitz CNRS, Toulouse School of Management-Research, Université Toulouse Capitole, Toulouse, France
  • Hélène Delacour IAE de Nancy, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
Keywords: editorial, sustainable academia, openness, slow science, open science


As we take stock of our new responsibilities to the Journal of M@n@gement and its various contributors, from authors to reviewers, editors, and readers, we also acknowledge the broader challenges that science and society face today. Academic communities have multiplied critics about science’s ‘health’ and ethics in general, or those of management and organization studies in particular. From the institutionalization of imposter syndrome in our fields (Bothello & Roulet, 2019) and a pandemic of burnout (World Economic Forum, 2019), to increased scientific misconducts and threats on scientific integrity (Honig et al., 2018) and to the inadequacy of commercial scientific publishing models with the view of science as a global public good (Willinsky, 2005), academics individually and collectively face major struggles that even connect to wider challenges like climate change or ‘datafication’. In that context, we believe that we need to reflect upon, define, and identify means to achieve ‘sustainable academia’.


Download data is not yet available.


Aggeri, F. (2017). How can performativity contribute to management and organization research? Theoretical Perspectives and analytical framework. M@n@gement, 20(1), 28–69.

Baron, N. (2010). Escape from the ivory tower: A guide to making your science matter. Washington, Covelo, London: Island Press.

Battilana, J. (2018). Cracking the organizational challenge of pursuing joint social and financial goals: Social enterprise as a laboratory to understand hybrid organizing. M@n@gement, 21(4), 1278–1305. doi: 10.3917/mana.214.1278

Berry, M. (1983). Une technologie invisible? L’impact des instruments de gestion sur l’évolution des systèmes humains. Centre de Recherche En Gestion de l’Ecole Polytechnique.

Bothello, J. & Roulet, T. J. (2019). The imposter syndrome, or the mis-representation of self in academic life. Journal of Management Studies, 56(4), 854–861. doi: 10.1111/joms.12344

Carton, G. & Mouricou, P. (2017). Is management research relevant? A systematic analysis of the rigor-relevance debate in top-tier journals (1994–2013). M@n@gement, 20(2), 166–203. doi: 10.3917/mana.202.0166

Cruz, L. B., Alves, M. A. & Delbridge, R. (2017). Next steps in organizing alternatives to capitalism: Toward a relational research agenda: M@n@gement, 20(4), 322–335. doi: 10.3917/mana.204.0322

Daudigeos, T. & Roulet, T. J. (2018). Open-access management research at a turning point: Giving relevance to a stigmatized object. M@n@gement, 21(4), 1178–1185. doi: 10.3917/mana.214.1178

Honig, B., Lampel, J., Baum, J. A. C., Glynn, M. A., et al. (2018). Reflections on scientific misconduct in management: Unfortunate incidents or a normative crisis? Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(4), 412–442. doi: 10.5465/amp.2015.0167

Mintzberg, H. (2015). My own book review. M@n@gement, 18(2), 186–188. doi: 10.3917/mana.182.0186

O’Doherty, D., De Cock, C., Rehn, A. & Lee Ashcraft, K. (2013). New sites/sights: Exploring the white spaces of organization. Organization Studies, 34(10), 1427–1444. doi: 10.1177/0170840613499654

Ouahab, A. & Maclouf, E. (2019). Diversity and struggles in critical performativity. The case of French Community-Supported Agriculture. M@n@gement, 19(4), 537–558.

Taupin, B. (2019). The role of nonhuman entities in institutional work: The case of the ocean in a surfing-centered local economy. M@n@gement, 19(4), 584–618.

Willinsky, J. (2005). Scholarly associations and the economic viability of open access publishing. Open Journal System Demonstration Journal, 1(1).

World Economic Forum. (2019). What causes us to burnout at work? World Economic Forum. Retrieved from

Wright, C. & Nyberg, D. (2017). An inconvenient truth: How organizations translate climate change into business as usual. Academy of Management Journal, 60(5), 1633–1661. doi: 10.5465/amj.2015.0718

Wynes, S., Donner, S. D., Tannason, S. & Nabors, N. (2019). Academic air travel has a limited influence on professional success. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 959–967. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.109

How to Cite
Berkowitz H., & Delacour H. (2020). Sustainable Academia: Open, Engaged, and Slow Science. M@n@gement, 23(1), 1-3.