Questioning ‘Feminine Managerial Behavior’ – A European Study Considering Gender Ideology
Abstract
The concept of a ‘feminine managerial behavior’, which implies that women in managerial positions behave differently to men in similar positions by exhibiting a more supportive management style, is both widespread and controversial. To gain new insight into the debate, this study looks at the role national gender ideology plays in structuring the relationship between sex and perceived managerial support. Based on a representative sample of 22,391 employees from 26 European countries, our findings reveal that, on average, perceived managerial support is higher when supervisors are women. However, if we control for the moderating role of national gender ideology, this difference disappears. Therefore, this article contributes to the nature/nurture debate by showing that gender differences in perceived managerial support stem primarily from persistent gender stereotypes.
Downloads
References
Alesina, A., Giuliano, P. & Nunn, N. (2013). On the origins of gender roles: Women and the plough. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(2), 469–530. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjt005
Alvesson, M. & Gabriel, Y. (2013). Beyond formulaic research: In praise of greater diversity in organizational research and publications. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(2), 245–263. doi: 10.5465/amle.2012.0327
Ariza-Montes, A., Arjona-Fuentes, J. M., Han, H. & Law, R. (2018). Work environment and well-being of different occupational groups in hospitality: Job demand – Control – Support model. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 73, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.01.010
Artz, B., Goodall, A. H. & Oswald, A. J. (2020). How common are bad bosses? Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 59(1), 3–39. doi: 10.1111/irel.12247
Autio, E., Pathak, S. & Wennberg, K. (2013). Consequences of cultural practices for entrepreneurial behaviors. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(4), 334–362. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2013.15
Bagger, J. & Li, A. (2012). Being important matters: The impact of work and family centralities on the family-to-work conflict – Satisfaction relationship. Human Relations, 65(4), 473–500. doi: 10.1177/0018726711430557
Bagger, J., Li, A. & Gutek, B. A. (2008). How much do you value your family and does it matter? The joint effects of family identity salience, family-interference-with-work, and gender. Human Relations, 61(2), 187–211. doi: 10.1177/0018726707087784
Beblo, M., & Görges, L. (2018). On the nature of nurture. The malleability of gender differences in work preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 151, 19–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2018.05.002
Bender, K. A., Heywood, J. S. & Kidd, M. P. (2017). Claims of employment discrimination and worker voice. Industrial Relations Journal, 48(2), 133–153. doi: 10.1111/irj.12172
Biemann, T., Cole, M. S., & Voelpel, S. (2012). Within-group agreement: On the use (and misuse) of rWG and rWG(J) in leadership research and some best practice guidelines. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 66–80. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.006
Bliese, P. D. (1998). Group size, ICC values, and group-level correlations: A simulation. Organizational Research Methods, 1(4), 355–373. doi: 10.1177/109442819814001
Bliese, P. D., Maltarich, M. A., & Hendricks, J. L. (2018). Back to basics with mixed-effects models: Nine take-away points. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1007/s10869-017-9491-z
Booth, A. L., & Ours, J. C. V. (2008). Job satisfaction and family happiness: The part-time work puzzle. The Economic Journal, 118(526), 77–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02117.x
Broadbridge, A. M., Maxwell, G. A. & Ogden, S. M. (2007). Experiences, perceptions and expectations of retail employment for Generation Y. Career Development International, 12(6), 523–544. doi: 10.1108/13620430710822001
Bueno Merino, P. & Duchemin, M.-H. (2022). Contribution of psychological entrepreneurial support to the strengthening of female entrepreneurial intention in a women-only incubator. M@n@gement, 25(4), 64–79. doi: 10.37725/mgmt.v25.4556
Chambel, M. J. & Castanheira, F. (2006). Different temporary work status, different behaviors in organization. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20(3), 351–367. doi: 10.1007/s10869-005-9015-0
Davis, S. N. & Greenstein, T. N. (2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 87–105. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115920
De Cuyper, N., Piccoli, B., Fontinha, R. & De Witte, H. (2019). Job insecurity, employability and satisfaction among temporary and permanent employees in post-crisis Europe. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 40(2), 173–192. doi: 10.1177/0143831X18804655
Dolan, S. L., Bejarano, A. & Tzafrir, S. (2011). Exploring the moderating effect of gender in the relationship between individuals’ aspirations and career success among engineers in Peru. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(15), 3146–3167. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2011.560883
Douglas, C. (2012). The moderating role of leader and follower sex in dyads on the leadership behavior – Leader effectiveness relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 163–175. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.013
Due Billing, Y. & Alvesson, M. (2000). Questioning the notion of feminine leadership: A critical perspective on the gender labelling of leadership. Gender, Work & Organization, 7(3), 144–157. doi: 10.1111/1468-0432.00103
Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. & van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 569–591. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569
Eagly, A. H. & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
Eagly, A. H. & Wood, W. (2017). Gender identity: Nature and nurture working together. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, 1(1), 59–62. doi: 10.26613/esic/1.1.10
Ellingsæter, A. L. (2013). Scandinavian welfare states and gender (de) segregation: Recent trends and processes. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 34(3), 501–518. doi: 10.1177/0143831X13491616
Essig, E. & Soparnot, R. (2019). Re-thinking gender inequality in the workplace – A framework from the male perspective. M@n@gement, 22(3), 373–410. doi: 10.3917/mana.223.0373
Fernández, R. (2007). Cultural change as learning: The evolution of female labor force participation over a century. American Economic Review, 103(1), 472–500. doi: 10.3386/w13373
Fernández, R. & Fogli, A. (2009). Culture: An empirical investigation of beliefs, work, and fertility. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 1(1), 146–177. doi: 10.1257/mac.1.1.146
Figureau, A.-G., Hamelin, A. & Pfiffelmann, M. (2020). Experimentally validated surveys: Potential for studying cognitive and behavioral issues in management. M@n@gement, 23(4), 1–12. doi: 10.37725/mgmt.v23i4.5613
Fogli, A. & Veldkamp, L. (2011). Nature or nurture? Learning and the geography of female labor force participation. Econometrica, 79(4), 1103–1138. doi: 10.3982/ECTA7767
Fortin, N. M. (2005). Gender role attitudes and the labour-market outcomes of women across OECD countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21(3), 416–438. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/gri024
Ganzach, Y. (2003). Intelligence, education, and facets of job satisfaction. Work and Occupations, 30(1), 97–122. doi: 10.1177/0730888402239328
Gaunt, R. & Benjamin, O. (2007). Job insecurity, stress and gender: The moderating role of gender ideology. Community, Work & Family, 10(3), 341–355. doi: 10.1080/13668800701456336
Ghaus, B., Lodhi, I. & Shakir, M. (2018). Much of a muchness? The role of gender similarity in a relationship between LMX and OCB. Global Social Sciences Review, III(IV), 284–308. doi: 10.31703/gssr.2018(III-IV).19
Goldstein, H., Browne, W. & Rasbash, J. (2002). Partitioning variation in multilevel models. Understanding Statistics: Statistical Issues in Psychology, Education, and the Social Sciences, 1(4), 223–231. doi: 10.1207/S15328031US0104_02
Greasley, K. & Thomas, P. (2020). HR analytics: The onto-epistemology and politics of metricised HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(4), 494–507. doi: 10.1111/1748-8583.12283
Grunow, D., Begall, K. & Buchler, S. (2018). Gender ideologies in Europe: A multidimensional framework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(1), 42–60. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12453
Harley, B. (2015). The one best way? ‘Scientific’ research on HRM and the threat to critical scholarship. Human Resource Management Journal, 25(4), 399–407. doi: 10.1111/1748-8583.12082
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1–26. doi: 10.9707/2307-0919.1014
Hoobler, J. M., Masterson, C. R., Nkomo, S. M. & Michel, E. J. (2018). The business case for women leaders: Meta-analysis, research critique, and path forward. Journal of Management, 44(6), 2473–2499. doi: 10.1177/0149206316628643
Ketokivi, M. & Mantere, S. (2010). Two strategies for inductive reasoning in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 315–333. doi: 10.5465/amr.2010.48463336
Kitchin, R. (2014). Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 1(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1177/2053951714528481
Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M. & Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 202–220. doi: 10.1177/1094428105284919
Leung, K. & Morris, M. W. (2015). Values, schemas, and norms in the culture-behavior nexus: A situated dynamics framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(9), 1028–1050. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2014.66
Locke, E. A. (2007). The case for inductive theory building. Journal of Management, 33(6), 867–890. doi: 10.1177/0149206307307636
Madsen, S. R. & Andrade, M. S. (2018). Unconscious gender bias: Implications for women’s leadership development. Journal of Leadership Studies, 12(1), 62–67. doi: 10.1002/jls.21566
Maher, K. J. (1997). Gender-related stereotypes of transformational and transactional leadership. Sex Roles, 37(3–4), 209–225. doi: 10.1023/A:1025647811219
McGuinness, S. & Wooden, M. (2009). Overskilling, job insecurity, and career mobility. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 48(2), 265–286. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-232X.2009.00557.x
Min, J., Johnson, M. D., Anderson, J. R. & Yurkiw, J. (2022). Support exchanges between adult children and their parents across life transitions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 84(2), 367–392. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12787
Murphy, K. R. & Aguinis, H. (2019). HARKing: How badly can cherry-picking and question trolling produce bias in published results? Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s10869-017-9524-7
Orloff, A. S. (1993). Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. American Sociological Review, 58(3), 303–328. doi: 10.2307/2095903
Peterson, H. (2015). Exit the king. Enter the maid: Changing discourses on gendered management ideals in Swedish Higher Education. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 30(5), 343–357. doi: 10.1108/GM-09-2013-0113
Pigeyre, F. & Vernazobres, P. (2013). Le « management au féminin »: Entre stéréotypes et ambigüités. Management international, 17(4), 194–209. doi: 10.7202/1020677ar
Renkema, M., Meijerink, J. & Bondarouk, T. (2016). Advancing multilevel thinking and methods in HRM research. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 3(2), 204–218. doi: 10.1108/JOEPP-03-2016-0027
Rights, J. D. & Sterba, S. K. (2019). Quantifying explained variance in multilevel models: An integrative framework for defining R-squared measures. Psychological Methods, 24(3), 309–338. doi: 10.1037/met0000184
Saint-Michel, S. (2018). Leader gender stereotypes and transformational leadership: Does leader sex make the difference? M@n@gement, 21(3), 944–966. doi: 10.3917/mana.213.0944
Saint-Michel, S. & Wielhorski, N. (2011). Style de leadership, LMX et engagement organisationnel des salariés: Le genre du leader a-t-il un impact? @GRH, 1(1), 13–38. doi: 10.3917/grh.111.0013
Sawang, S. (2010). Moderation or mediation? An examination of the role perceived managerial support has on job satisfaction and psychological strain. Current Psychology, 29(3), 247–256. doi: 10.1007/s12144-010-9083-9
Shieh, G. (2016). Choosing the best index for the average score intraclass correlation coefficient. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 994–1003. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0623-y
Smyth, E. & Steinmetz, S. (2008). Field of study and gender segregation in European labour markets. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 49(4–5), 257–281. doi: 10.1177/0020715208093077
Stewart, J. L. & Wiener, K. K. K. (2021). Does supervisor gender moderate the mediation of job embeddedness between LMX and job satisfaction? Gender in Management: An International Journal, 36(4), 536–552. doi: 10.1108/GM-07-2019-0137
Sweet, S., Sarkisian, N., Matz-Costa, C. & Pitt-Catsouphes, M. (2016). Are women less career centric than men? Structure, culture, and identity investments. Community, Work & Family, 19(4), 481–500. doi: 10.1080/13668803.2015.1078287
Tlaiss, H. A. & Mendelson, M. B. (2014). Predicting women’s job satisfaction with personal demographics: Evidence from a Middle Eastern country. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(3), 434–458. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2013.792859
Vecchio, R. P. & Brazil, D. M. (2007). Leadership and sex-similarity: A comparison in a military setting. Personnel Psychology, 60(2), 303–335. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00075.x
Wajcman, J. (1996). Desperately seeking differences: Is management style gendered? British Journal of Industrial Relations, 34(3), 333–349. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8543.1996.tb00478.x
Wenzel, R. & Van Quaquebeke, N. (2018). The double-edged sword of big data in organizational and management research: A review of opportunities and risks. Organizational Research Methods, 21(3), 548–591. doi: 10.1177/1094428117718627
Wijaya, N. H. S. (2019). Proactive personality, LMX, and voice behavior: Employee – Supervisor sex (dis)similarity as a moderator. Management Communication Quarterly, 33(1), 86–100. doi: 10.1177/0893318918804890
Witt, M. A., Fainshmidt, S. & Aguilera, R. V. (2022). Our board, our rules: Nonconformity to global corporate governance norms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 67(1), 131–166. doi: 10.1177/00018392211022726
Woehr, D. J., Loignon, A. C., Schmidt, P. B., Loughry, M. L. & Ohland, M. W. (2015). Justifying aggregation with consensus-based constructs: A review and examination of cutoff values for common aggregation indices. Organizational Research Methods, 18(4), 704–737. doi: 10.1177/1094428115582090
Ye, R. M., Wang, X.-H. F., Wendt, J. H., Wu, J. & Euwema, M. C. (2016). Gender and managerial coaching across cultures: Female managers are coaching more. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(16), 1791–1812. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2015.1075570
Zhao, K., Zhang, M. & Foley, S. (2019). Testing two mechanisms linking work-to-family conflict to individual consequences: Do gender and gender role orientation make a difference? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(6), 988–1009. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2017.1282534
Copyright (c) 2024 The Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to the AIMS.
Published by 