Reflection on Historical Studies of Institutional Change: Small Steps Are Not Necessarily Missteps. A Rejoinder to Daudigeos, Boutinot And Jaumier.

  • Hélène Peton Université Paris-Est, IRG (EA 2354), UPEC, F-94010, Créteil
  • Stéphan Pezé Université Paris-Est, IRG (EA 2354), UPEC, F-94010, Créteil

Abstract

The study of institutional change over a period of history involves several theoretical and methodological issues. In proposing a commentary on our article published in Vol. 17 n°3 of M@n@gement (Peton and Pezé, 2014), Daudigeos, Boutinot and Jaumier have provided an opportunity to open up the debate, and we thank them for that. Their commentary concerns two major points: a methodological question concerning the choice of data in a historical research context, and a resulting reflection on the consideration given to collective representations in analysis of institutional work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2015-09-01
How to Cite
Peton H., & Pezé S. (2015). Reflection on Historical Studies of Institutional Change: Small Steps Are Not Necessarily Missteps. A Rejoinder to Daudigeos, Boutinot And Jaumier. M@n@gement, 18(3), 261-265. Retrieved from https://management-aims.com/index.php/mgmt/article/view/3932
Section
Original Research Articles