Whistleblowers or Offenders? A Judicial Approach to Whistleblowing – The LuxLeaks Case

  • Oussama Ouriemmi ISG Paris, Paris, France
  • Wafa Ben Khaled University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  • Mahaut Fanchini IRG, Université Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France
Keywords: Whistleblower, Whistleblowing, Retaliation, Judge, Judicialisation, Normativity, Ethics

Abstract

The aim of this article is to study the role of judges and their impact on the retaliation processes initiated by organisations against whistleblowers. More specifically, we question the normative logics used by judges to validate or invalidate such processes. To this end, we cross-check and analyse judicial data from the LuxLeaks case (2010–2018). Our results firstly enable us to establish a relationship between, on the one hand, the interpretative power of judges and their profile and, on the other, the attitude that judges may have at the end of the retaliation process towards whistleblowers, that is, retaliatory actors or protective actors. Our results also explain the normative dynamics that permeate the judicial retaliation process. They show that judges can challenge existing legal norms, clarify and operationalise others, and create new norms regulating ethical behaviour in organisations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References


Alford, C. (2002). Whistleblowers: Broken lives and organizational power. Cornell University.


Arnold, D & Ponemon, L. (1991). Internal auditors’ perceptions of whistleblowing and the influence of moral reasoning: An experiment. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 10(2), 1–15. doi: 10822/848968


Bastuck, N. (2015). Une petite plage de publicité. In H. Bouthinon-Dumas, V. De Beaufort, F. Jenny & A. Masson (Eds.), Communication juridique et judiciaire (pp. 215–225). Larcier.


Ben Khaled, W. & Gond, J. P. (2020). How do external regulations shape the design of ethical tools in organisations? An open polity and sociology of compliance perspective. Human Relations, 73(5), 653–681. doi: 10.1177/0018726719828437


Bjørkelo, B. (2013). Workplace bullying after whistleblowing: Future research and implications. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28, 306–323. doi: 10.1108/02683941311321178


Cailleba, P. & Charreire Petit, S. (2018). The whistleblowing as the personification of a moral and managerial paradox. M@n@gement, 21(1), 675–690. doi: 10.3917/mana.211.0675


CAL. (2017a). Judgment of the Court of Appeal of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, March 15. https://justice.public.lu/fr/actualites/2017/03/arret-luxleaks-cour-appel.html


CAL. (2017b). Press release concerning the judgment of the Court of Appeal of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg in the so-called ‘LuxLeaks’ case, March 15. https://justice.public.lu/fr/actualites/2017/03/communique-de-presse-arret-cour-d-appel-luxleaks.html


CAL. (2018). Judgment of the newly constituted Court of Appeal of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, May 15. https://justice.public.lu/fr/actualites/2018/05/arret-luxleaks-deltour.html


Canguilhem, G. (2013). Le normal et le pathologique. Presses Universitaires de France.


Canivet, G. (2009). Le juge et la force normative. In C. Thibierge (Ed.), La force normative: Naissance d’un concept (pp. 23–27). Bruyant.


Carr, I. & Lewis, D. (2010). Combating corruption through employment law and whistleblower protection. Industrial Law Journal, 39(1), 52–81. doi: 10.1093/indlaw/dwp027


CCL. (2018a). Judgment of the Court of Cassation of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg concerning the appeal of Mr. Halet, January 11. https://justice.public.lu/fr/actualites/2018/01/arret-n-3911-cassation-halet.html


CCL. (2018b). Judgment of the Court of Cassation of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg concerning the appeal of Mr. Deltour, January 11. https://justice.public.lu/fr/actualites/2018/01/arret-3912-cassation--deltour.html


CCL. (2018c). Press release concerning the judgment of the Court of Cassation of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg in the ‘LuxLeaks’ case, January 11. https://justice.public.lu/fr/actualites/2018/01/cassation-luxleaks.html


Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.


Charreire Petit, S. & Cusin, J. (2013). Whistleblowing and resilience: Analysis of an individual trajectory. M@n@gement, 16(2), 141–173. doi: 10.3917/mana.162.0142


Chevallier, J. (2014), L’État post-moderne. Droit et société.


Commaille, J. & Dumoulin, L. (2009). Heurs et malheurs de la légalité dans les sociétés contemporaines. Une sociologie politique de la ‘judiciarisation’. L’Année Sociologique, 59, 63–107. doi: 10.3917/anso.091.0063


Contu, A. (2014). Rationality and relationality in the process of whistleblowing: Recasting whistleblowing through readings of Antigone. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23(4), 393–406. doi: 10.1177/1056492613517512


Crane, A. & Matten, D. (2010). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalisation. Oxford University Press.


Culiberg, B. & Mihelič, K. K. (2017). The evolution of whistleblowing studies: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(4), 787–803. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3237-0


Delpeuch, T., Dumoulin, L. & Galembert, C. (2014). Sociologie du droit et de la justice. Armand Colin.


Dournaux, F. (2013). La densification normative, processus d’évolution du droit. In C. Thibierge (Ed.), La densification normative. Découverte d’un processus (pp. 187–210). Mare et Martin.


Dumoulin, L. & Roussel, V. (2010). La judiciarisation de l’action publique. In O. Borraz, V. Guiraudon (Eds.), Politiques publiques 2 (pp. 243–263). Presses de Sciences Po.


Dworkin, T. M. & Baucus, M. S. (1998). Internal vs. external whistleblowers: A comparison of whistleblowering processes. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(12), 1281–1298. doi: 10.1023/A:1005916210589


Edelman, L. B. (1990). Legal environments and organizational governance: The expansion of due process in the American workplace. American Journal of Sociology, 95(6), 1401–1440. doi: 10.1086/229459


Edelman, L. B. (1992). Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law. American Journal of Sociology, 97(6), 1531–1576. doi: 10.1086/229939


Edelman, L. B. (2011). L’endogénéité du droit. In C. Bessy, T. Delpeuch & J. Pélisse (Eds.), Droit et régulations des activités économiques: Perspectives sociologiques et institutionnalistes (pp. 85–109). L.G.D.J.


Gabbioneta, C., Greenwood, R., Mazzola, P. & Minoja, M. (2013). The influence of the institutional context on corporate illegality. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(6/7), 484–504. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2012.09.002


Hirschl, R. (2008). The judicialization of politics. In K. E. Whittington, D. Kelemen & G. Caldeira (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of law and politics (pp. 119–141). Oxford University Press.


Johnson, C. E. et al. (2004). Blowing the whistle on Fen-Phen. Journal of Business Communication, 41, 350–369. doi: 10.1177/0021943604265608


Kenny, K., Fotaki, M. & Scriver, S. (2019). Mental health as a weapon: Whistleblower retaliation and normative violence. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(3), 801–815. doi: 10.1007/s10551-018-3868-4


Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710. doi: 10.5465/amr.1999.2553248


Lavite, C. (2016). L’approche socio-légale de la protection des lanceurs d’alerte: Pistes de réflexion pour un enrichissement sociologique de l’analyse juridique. La Revue des droits de l’homme.


Lee, J., Heilmann, S. G. & Near, J. P. (2004). Blowing the whistle on sexual harassment: Test of a model of predictors and outcomes. Human Relations, 57, 297–322. doi: 10.1177/0018726704043273


Lewis, D. (2011). Whistleblowing in a changing legal climate: Is it time to revisit our approach to trust and loyalty at the workplace? Business Ethics, 20(1), 71–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8608.2010.01609.x


Liyanarachchi, G. & Newdick, C. (2009). The impact of moral reasoning and retaliation on whistleblowing: New Zealand evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(1), 37–57. doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9983-x


Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). Whistleblowing in organizations: An examination of correlates of whistleblowing intentions, actions, and retaliation. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(3), 277–297. doi: 10.1007/s10551-005-0849-1


Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P. & Dworkin, T. M. (2008). Whistle-blowing in organizations. Routledge.


Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P. & Dworkin, T. M. (2009). A word to the wise: How managers and policy-makers can encourage employees to report wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(3), 379–396. doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9853-6


Miceli, M. P., Rehg, M., Near, J. P. & Ryan, K. C. (1999), Can laws protect whistleblowers? Results of a naturally occurring field experiment. Work And Occupations, 26(1), 129–151. doi: 10.1177/0730888499026001007


Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.


Near, J. P. & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1007/BF00382668


Near, J. P. & Miceli, M. P. (1986). Retaliation against whistleblowers: Predictors and effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(1), 137–145. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.71.1.137


Near, J. P. & Miceli, M. P. (1995). Effective-whistleblowing. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 679–708. doi: 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080334


Neu, D., Everett, J. Rahaman, A. S. & Martinez, D. (2013). Accounting and networks of corruption. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38, 505–524. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2012.01.003


Ost, F. (2004). Jupiter, Hercule, Hermès. In L. Cadiet (Ed.), Dictionnaire de la justice (pp. 698–701). Presses Universitaires de France.


Ouriemmi, O. & Gérard, B. (2017). La responsabilisation de la Société Générale: Normes juridiques et management dans le volet civil du procès Kerviel. Revue Française de Gestion, 269, 65–81. doi: 10.3166/rfg.2017.00201


Parmerlee, M. A., Near, J. P. & Jensen, T. C. (1982). Correlates of whistleblowers’ perceptions of organizational retaliation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(1), 17–34. doi: 10.2307/2392544


Rehg, M. T., Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P. & Van Scotter, J. R. (2008). Antecedents and outcomes of retaliation against whistleblowers: Gender differences and power relationships. Organization Science, 19(2), 221–240. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0310


Richardson, B. K. & McGlynn, J. (2011). Rabid fans, death threats, and dysfunctional stakeholders: The influence of organizational and industry contexts on whistleblowing cases. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(1), 121–150. doi: 10.1177/0893318910380344


Segrestin, B. & Levillain, K. (2018). La mission de l’entreprise responsable. Principes et normes de gestion. Presses des Mines.


Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. Sage.


TCL. (2016). Judgment of the Correctional Tribunal of Luxembourg, June 29. https://justice.public.lu/fr/actualites/2016/06/jugement-affaire-luxleaks.html


UE. (2016). Directive 2016/943 on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure, June 8. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016L0943&from=FR


UE. (2019). Directive 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law, October 23. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32019L1937&from=FR


Vandekerckhove, W. (2010). European whistleblowing policies: Tiers or tears? In D. Lewis (Ed.), A global approach to public interest disclosure: What can we learn from existing whistleblowing legislation and research? (pp. 15–35). Edward Elgar.


Vandekerckhove, W. & Lewis, D. (2012). The content of whistleblowing procedures: A critical review of recent official guidelines. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(2), 253–264. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-1089-1


Van Maanen, J. (1979). The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 539–550. doi: 10.2307/2392360

Published
2021-12-15
How to Cite
OuriemmiO., Ben KhaledW., & FanchiniM. (2021). Whistleblowers or Offenders? A Judicial Approach to Whistleblowing – The LuxLeaks Case. M@n@gement, 24(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.37725/mgmt.v24.5449
Section
Original Research Articles