International Management, Should We Abandon the Myth of Cultural Hybridity? A Re-examination of the Contribution of Postcolonial and Decolonial Approaches
The postcolonial and decolonial approaches open the way for a rich analysis of the material and cultural conditions in which international management operates, is spread, interpreted, and implemented. They also offer food for thought on the possibilities, tensions, and resistance associated with reinventing alternative organizations more respectful of the dignity of all, while still providing knowledge that is socially and politically useful for oppressed and marginalized groups. Nevertheless, and despite their undeniable contribution to the theoretical development of critical approaches in international management, these perspectives are faced with challenges and difficulties in both intellectual and empirical terms. In this article, I suggest a series of ways forward, which might allow for the renewal of the critical fruitfulness of this intellectual and political project, crucial to face the contemporary challenges of international management.
Alcadipani, R. & Faria, A. (2014). Fighting Latin American marginality in international business. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 10(1–2), 107–117. doi: 10.1108/cpoib-11-2013-0047
Alcadipani, R., Khan, F. R., Gantman, E. & Nkomo, S. (2012). Southern voices in management and organization knowledge. Organization, 12(2), 131–143. doi: 10.1177/1350508411431910
Alcadipani, R. & Reis Rosa, A. (2011). From grobal management to glocal management: Latin American perspectives as a counter-dominant management epistemology. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 28(4), 453–466. doi: 10.1002/cjas.165
Banerjee, S. B. & Prasad, A. (2008). Introduction to the special issue on “Critical reflections on management and organizations: A postcolonial perspective.” Critical Perspectives on International Business, 4(2/3), 90–98. doi: 10.1108/17422040810869963
Bhabha, H. (1984). Of mimicry and man: The ambivalence of colonial discourse. October, 28, 125–133. doi: 10.2307/778467
Boidin, C. (2009). Études décoloniales et postcoloniales dans les débats français. Cahiers des Amériques Latines, 62, 129–140. doi: 10.4000/cal.1620
Cooke, B. (2004). The managing of the (third) world. Organization, 11(5), 603–629. doi: 10.1177/1350508404044063
Dar, S. (2018). De-colonizing the boundary-object. Organization Studies, 39(4), 565–584. doi: 10.1177/0170840617708003
D’Iribarne, P. (2003). Trois figures de la liberté. Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 58(5), 953–978. doi: 10.1017/S0395264900018084
D’Iribarne, P. (2009). Conceptualising national cultures: An anthropological perspective. European Journal of International Management, 3(2), 6. doi: 10.1504/EJIM.2009.024320
Doorewaard, H. & Van Bijsterveld, M. (2001). The Osmosis of ideas: An analysis of the integrated approach to IT management from a translation theory perspective. Organization, 8(1), 55–76. doi: 10.1177/135050840181004
Dupuis, J-P., Davel, E. & Chanlat, J-F. (2007). Culture and development, the continuing tension between modern standards and local contexts, Culture, Institutions and development, New insights Into an Old debate (pp. 20–64). Routledge.
Dussel, E. (2009). Pour un dialogue mondial entre traditions philosophiques. Cahiers des Amériques Latines, 62(2009/3), 111–127. doi: 10.4000/cal.1619
Frenkel, M. (2005). The politics of translation: How state-level political relations affect the cross-national travel of management ideas. Organization, 12(2), 275–301. doi: 10.1177/1350508405051191
Frenkel, M. (2006). From binarism back to hybridity: A postcolonial reading of management and organization studies. Organization Studies, 27(6), 855–876. doi: 10.1177/0170840606064086
Frenkel, M. (2008). The multinational corporation as a third space: Rethinking international management discourse on knowledge transfer through Homi Bhabha. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 924–942. doi: 10.5465/amr.2008.34422002
Frenkel, M. & Shenhav, Y. (2003). From Americanization to colonization: The diffusion of productivity models revisited. Organization Studies, 24(9), 1537–1561. doi: 10.1177/0170840603249006
Gantman, E. R. & Parker, M. (2006). Comprador management?: Organizing management knowledge in Argentina (1975–2003). Critical Perspectives on International Business, 2(1), 25–40. doi: 10.1108/17422040610644144
Gantman, E. R., Yousfi, H. & Alcadipani, R. (2015). Challenging Anglo-Saxon dominance in management and organizational knowledge. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 55(2), 6. doi: 10.1590/S0034-759020150202
Grosfoguel, R. (2010). Vers une décolonisation des « uni-versalismes » occidentaux : le « pluri-versalisme décolonial », d’Aimé Césaire aux zapatistes. In A. Mbembe (Ed.), Ruptures postcoloniales: Les nouveaux visages de la société française (pp. 119–138). La Découverte.
Hall, S. (1992). The West and the rest: Discourse and power. In T. D. Gupta, C. E. James, C. Andersen, G-E. Galabuzi & R. C. A. Maaka (Eds.), Race and racialization (2nd ed., pp. 85–95). Canadian Scholars.
Ibarra-Colado, E. (2006). Organization studies and epistemic coloniality in Latin America: Thinking otherness from the margins. Organization, 13(4), 463–488. doi: 10.1177/1350508406065851
Islam, G. (2012). Can the subaltern eat? Anthropophagic culture as a Brazilian lens on post-colonial theory. Organization, 19(2), 159–180. doi: 10.1177/1350508411429396
Jack, G. (2015). Advancing postcolonial approaches in critical diversity studies. In R. Bendl, I. Bleijenbergh, E. Henttonen & A. J. Mills (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of diversity in organizations (pp. 153–174). Oxford University Press.
Jack, G. & Westwood, R. (2009). International and cross-cultural management studies: A postcolonial reading. Springer. doi: 10.1057/9780230248441
Jackson, T. (2002). The management of people across cultures: Valuing people differently. Human Resource Management, 41(4), 455–475. doi: 10.1002/hrm.10054
Kaasila-Pakanen, A-L. (2015). A postcolonial deconstruction of diversity management and multiculturalism. In R. Bendl, I. Bleijenbergh, E. Henttonen & A. J. Mills (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of diversity in organizations (pp. 175–194). Oxford University Press.
Kipping, M., Engwall, L. & Üsdiken, B. (2008). Preface: The transfer of management knowledge to peripheral countries. International Studies of Management and Organization, 38(4), 3–16. doi: 10.2753/IMO0020-8825380400
Kostova, T. & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 215–233. doi: 10.2307/3069293
Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester School, 22(2), 139–191. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9957.1954.tb00021.x
Lo, J., Khoo, T. & Gilbert, H. (2000). New formations in Asian-Australian cultural politics. Journal of Australian Studies, 24(65), 1–12. doi: 10.1080/14443050009387580
Mignolo, W. D. (2000/2012). Local histories/global designs: Coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton University Press.
Mir, A. (2003). The hegemonic discourse of management texts. Journal of Management Education, 27(6), 734–738. doi: 10.1177/1052562903257944
Nkomo, S. M. (2011). A postcolonial and anti-colonial reading of “African” leadership and management in organization studies: Tensions, contradictions and possibilities. Organization, 18(3), 365–386. doi: 10.1177/1350508411398731
Parry, B. (1994). Signs of our times: Discussion of Homi Bhabha’s the location of culture. Third Text, 8(28–29), 5–24. doi: 10.1080/09528829408576499
Seremani, T. W. & Clegg, S. (2016). Postcolonialism, organization, and management theory: The role of “epistemological third spaces.” Journal of Management Inquiry, 25(2), 171–183. doi: 10.1177/1056492615589973
Tayeb, M. (2001). Conducting research across cultures: Overcoming drawbacks and obstacles. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 1(1), 91–108. doi: 10.1177/147059580111009
Yousfi H. (2010). Culture and development: the continuing tension between modern standards and local contexts. In J. P. Platteau & R. Peccoud (Eds.). Culture, Institutions and development, New insights Into an Old debate (p. 57). Routledge.
Copyright (c) 2021 Hela YOUSFI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to the AIMS.