Cooperative Learning Through Boundary Spanning: How a Corporate Learning Department Ensures That Trainers and Content Stay Current
Abstract
Continuous learning is central to ensuring organizations remain innovative and high-performing. Corporate trainers play a critical role in educating and training employees. However, in an era of digital transformation and, more recently, artificial intelligence, trainers need new skills and methods to stay current and facilitate the transformation of the workforce. The skills gap is best filled through cooperative learning with other trainers. However, cooperative learning is hindered by different spatial, organizational, and cultural boundaries that are difficult to overcome.
This paper attempts to understand how cooperative learning of trainers can be enhanced through boundary spanning. It examines the case of the corporate learning department of a German high-tech multinational through ethnographic action research by the department manager, including 21 semi-directive interviews and direct observation. Using a grounded theory approach, we explore how the concept, causes, context, contingencies, and conditions of boundary spanning enhance cooperative learning among corporate trainers.
The findings show that boundary spanning leads to cooperative learning through pedagogical scaffolding, communities of practice, and a new learning culture. Spontaneous boundary spanning occurs in parallel to guided boundary spanning. Both are made possible by appropriate leadership values and attitudes, trust, flexibility, and dedicated time and capacity.
Our paper provides recommendations on the key issues managers face in facilitating boundary spanning and cooperative learning among their employees. We also show how key barriers and risks can be mitigated to enable employees to learn cooperatively with colleagues from different and distant organizational units.
Downloads
References
Avenier, M.-J. & Thomas, C. (2015). Finding one’s way around various methodological guidelines for doing rigorous case studies: A comparison of four epistemological frameworks. Systèmes d’information & Management, 20(1), 61–98. doi: 10.3917/sim.151.0061
Bartel-Radic, A. & Munch, F. (2023). Cross-cultural boundary spanning activities in a global team: Insights from an ethnographic case study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 23(2), 339–365. doi: 10.1177/14705958231185432
Caputo, A., Fiorentino, R. & Garzella, S. (2019). From the boundaries of management to the management of boundaries: Business processes, capabilities and negotiations. Business Process Management Journal, 25(3), 391–413. doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-11-2017-0334
Carlile, P. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555–568. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0094
Cedefop. (2024). 21st century workforce. Retrieved from https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/themes/21st-century-workforce
Chanal, V. & Kimble, C. (2010). Born to be Wild: Using Communities of Practice as a Tool for Knowledge Management. Paper presented at the Ethicomp 2010: The ‘Backwards, Forwards and Sideways’ changes of ICT, Tarragona, Spain, pp. 71–80.
Collien, I. (2021). Concepts of power in boundary spanning research: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(4), 443–465. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12251
Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 19(6), 418–427. doi: 10.1515/zfsoz-1990-0602
Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50(3), 352–364. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0134
Dudézert, A., Roulleaux Dugage, M., Chauvin, F., Martin, F. et al. (2012). Le KM au coeur de la stratégie d’entreprise. Documentaliste-Sciences de l’information, 49(2), 26–43. doi: 10.3917/docsi.492.0026
Ernst, C. & Yip, J. (2009). Boundary-spanning leadership: Tactics to bridge social identity groups in organizations. In T. Pittinsky (Ed.), Crossing the divide: Intergroup leadership in a world of difference (pp. 87–100). Harvard Business Press.
Garcias, F., Dalmasso, C. & Sardas, J.-C. (2015). Paradoxical tensions in learning processes: Exploration, exploitation and exploitative learning. M@n@gement, 18(2), 156–178. doi: 10.3917/mana.182.0156
Gong, C. & Ribiere, V. (2021). Developing a unified definition of digital transformation. Technovation, 102, Article 102217. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102217
Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory Into Practice, 38(2), 67–73. doi: 10.1080/00405849909543834
Kortsch, T., Decius, J. & Paulsen, H. F. (2021). ‘New Learning’: Wie sich das Lernen bei der Arbeit verändert. Wirtschaftspsychologie Aktuell, 2021(1), 44–48.
Kusunoki, K., Nonaka, I. & Nagata, A. (1998). Organizational capabilities in product development of Japanese firms: A conceptual framework and empirical findings. Organization Science, 9(6), 699–718. doi: 10.1287/orsc.9.6.699
Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710. doi: 10.2307/259349
Li, J., Wiemann, K., Shi, W., Wang, Y. et al. (2019). Vocational education and training in Chinese and German companies in China: A ‘home international’ comparison. International Journal of Training and Development, 23(2), 153–168. doi: 10.1111/ijtd.12151
Lin, C.-P. (2007). To share or not to share: Modeling tacit knowledge sharing, its mediators and antecedents. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 411–428. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9119-0
MacDonald, M. (2001). Finding a critical perspective in grounded theory. In R. S. Schreiber & P. N. Stern (Eds.), Using grounded theory in nursing (pp. 113–157). Springer.
Mäkelä, K., Barner-Rasmussen, W., Ehrnrooth, M. & Koveshnikov, A. (2019). Potential and recognized boundary spanners in multinational corporations. Journal of World Business, 54(4), 335–349. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2019.05.001
Mehta, N., Chauhan, S., Gupta, P. & Jaiswal, M. (2021). Pursuing digital learning platform success: A meta-analytic investigation of user and cultural contingencies. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 48, 305–322. doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.04834
Moore, F. & Mahadevan, J. (2020). Ethnography and cross-cultural management. In B. Szkudlarek, L. Romani, D. Caprar & J. Osland (Eds.), The Sage handbook of contemporary cross-cultural management (pp. 128–140). Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781529714340
Nonaka, I. & von Krogh, G. (2009). Perspective – Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20(3), 635–652. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1080.0412
Peichl, A., Sauer, S. & Wohlrabe, K. (2022). Fachkräftemangel in Deutschland und Europa – Historie, Status quo und was getan werden muss. ifo Schnelldienst, 75(10), 70–75.
R4E. (2024). Helping Europe answer the reskilling challenges of the 21st century. Retrieved from https://reskilling4employment.eu/en/
Roberts, M. J. D. & Beamish, P. W. (2017). The scaffolding activities of international returnee executives: A learning based perspective of global boundary spanning. Journal of Management Studies, 54(4), 511–539. doi: 10.1111/joms.12266
Roth, E., Moencks, M., Beitinger, G., Freigang, A. et al. (2022). Microlearning in human-centric production systems. In IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 37–41), December 7–10, Kuala Lumpur.
Rouby, E. & Thomas, C. (2023). From individual to collective qualities of attention in dynamic work settings: Learning barriers to the development of collective mindful attention. M@n@gement, 26(2), 1–15. doi: 10.37725/mgmt.2023.4541
Schotter, A. P. J., Mudambi, R., Doz, Y. & Gaur, A. (2017). Boundary spanning in global organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 54(4), 403–421. doi: 10.1111/joms.12256
Schuchmann, D. & Seufert, S. (2015). Corporate learning in times of digital transformation: A conceptual framework and service portfolio for the learning function in banking organisations. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning, 8(1), 31–39. doi: 10.3991/ijac.v8i1.4440
Schwarzmüller, T., Brosi, P., Duman, D. & Welpe, I. M. (2018). How does the digital transformation affect organizations? Key themes of change in work design and leadership. Management Revue, 29(2), 114–138. doi: 10.5771/0935-9915-2018-2-114
Seufert, S. & Meier, C. (2016). From eLearning to digital transformation: A framework and implications for L&D. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning, 9(2), 27–33. doi: 10.3991/ijac.v9i2.6003
Siemsen, E., Roth, A. V., Balasubramanian, S. & Anand, G. (2009). The influence of psychological safety and confidence in knowledge on employee knowledge sharing. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 11(3), 429–447. doi: 10.1287/msom.1080.0233
Slavin, R. E. (2014). Making cooperative learning powerful. Educational Leadership, 72(2), 22–26.
Tacchi, J. (2015). Ethnographic action research: Media, information and communicative ecologies for development initiatives (pp. 220–229). In H. Bradbury (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of action research. SAGE. doi: 10.4135/9781473921290
Tippmann, E., Sharkey Scott, P. & Parker, A. (2017). Boundary capabilities in MNCs: Knowledge transformation for creative solution development. Journal of Management Studies, 54(4), 455–482. doi: 10.1111/joms.12253
Wass, R., Harland, T. & Mercer, A. (2011). Scaffolding critical thinking in the zone of proximal development. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(3), 317–328. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2010.489237
Welch, C., Piekkari, R., Plakoyiannaki, E. & Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. (2011). Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 740–762. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2010.55
Welk, S., Kortsch, T. & Kauffeld, S. (2023). How to foster informal learning: A cross-cultural study. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 67(2), 92–106. doi: 10.1026/0932-4089/a000394
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Zhang, W., Levenson, A. & Crossley, C. (2015). Move your research from the ivy tower to the board room: A primer on action research for academics, consultants, and business executives. Human Resource Management, 54(1), 151–174. doi: 10.1002/hrm.21616
Zhao, Z. J. & Anand, J. (2013). Beyond boundary spanners: The ‘collective bridge’ as an efficient interunit structure for transferring collective knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 34(13), 1513–1530. doi: 10.1002/smj.2080
Copyright (c) 2024 The Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to the AIMS.